Saturday, March 8, 2025

Musings on How Trump Has Undermined Trust in America

   Rudy Barnes, Jr., March 8, 2025


Before Trump’s Republicans took charge of American politics, I believed the church could be a moral steward of promoting the common good and political legitimacy.  I was wrong.  Now that Trump and his “Christian” charlatans have corrupted the political legitimacy of America’s politics, it will take more than the church to save America from ourselves.

 

David French has emphasized the priority of the Constitution as the foundation of law in America, but after the vast majority of Christians voted twice to make Trump their President, the church has lost its moral compass, being more concerned with its popularity than with challenging a corrupt Trump regime and restoring political legitimacy in America.


The altruistic moral teachings of Jesus are summarized in the greatest commandment to love God and our neighbors as we love ourselves.  Its moral imperative is to provide for the common good, but that has been lost in America’s polarized politics.  It will take an emphasis on supporting and defending the Constitution to promote the common good in America’s politics.


Holding the President accountable to support and defend the Constitution has become a legal priority in America, with Vance and Musk castigating President Zolensky during his visit to the White House.  It was an egregious example of Trump seeking to reshape the Constitution to increase the power of the executive branch at the expense of Congress.


Trump, Vance and Musk have already begun dismantling the federal workforce and terminating ongoing federal domestic and foreign programs with no Constitutional authority or Congressional mandate.  There is no moral or legal precedent for their irresponsible behavior; and so far the courts have not stopped Trump’s wreckage of the Constitutional order.


It’s a supreme test for the viability of America’s Constitutional democracy, and Trump’s Republicans in Congress have been marching lock-step with him.  With the American church silent on this existential moral and political disaster, David French has said, “As Trump destroys institutions, he destroys trust.  And trust, once destroyed, is the most difficult thing to restore.”


David French reminds us, “As we experience the consequences of Trump’s actions, we’re learning exactly why the /founders did not want the president to reign supreme.  We’re reminded once again that they possessed keen insight into the perils of governing a large fractious nation by executive fiat.”


Like other demagogues, Trump has often threatened to use military force to maintain order on his terms as he dismantles the Constitution and expands his power.  Ironically, Trump, or his successor, may have to consider mobilizing the military to support and defend the Constitution in America.  If so, Zolensky would appreciate the irony.



  

Notes:

“President Trump is doing damage to America that could take a generation or more to repair. The next election cannot fix what Trump is breaking. Neither can the one after that. To understand the gravity of the harm Trump has inflicted on the United States in the first month and a half of his presidency, a comparison with the Cold War is helpful. Republicans and Democrats often had sharp differences in their approach to the Soviet Union.  At no point did Americans go to the polls and choose between one candidate committed to NATO and another candidate sympathetic to the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. The very idea would have been fantastical. American elections could reset our national security strategy, but they did not change our bedrock alliances. They did not change our fundamental identity. 

Until now. Consider what happened in the Oval Office on Friday February 29. Trump and Vice President JD Vance ambushed President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on live television. Vance accused Zelensky of being “disrespectful,” and Trump attacked him directly: You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people. You’re gambling with World War III and what you’re doing to this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people say they should.  Trump has taught our most important strategic partners a lesson they will not soon forget: America can — and will — change sides. As we experience the consequences of Trump’s actions, we’re learning exactly why the founders did not want the president to reign supreme. We’re reminded once again that they possessed keen insight into the perils of governing a large, fractious nation by executive fiat. By challenging the constitutional order, Trump is challenging the stability of the American system itself.”  On Trump doing real damage to America, see  https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/02/opinion/trump-ukraine-zelensky-usaid.html.


WSJ Editorial Board Veiled Warning, Trump’s Old World Order, May 2, 2025 

It seems clear that Mr. Trump wants to wash his hands of Ukraine. “You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out,” Mr. Trump ordered Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday. This will embolden Vladimir Putin to insist on even harsher terms for a cease-fire deal. Mr. Trump is hammering traditional U.S. friends. He plans 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, in violation of his own USMCA trade deal, and his defense secretary has threatened to invade Mexico to pursue drug cartels. He wants to hit Western Europe with heavy tariffs on its autos, and slap reciprocal tariffs on the rest of the trading world. Meanwhile in the Americas, Mr. Trump has demanded control over the Panama Canal, which the U.S. ceded by treaty in 1999. And he wants Denmark to sell Greenland to the U.S. These moves taken together hint at a worldview that has long been the goal of American isolationists: Let China dominate the Pacific, Russia dominate Europe, and the U.S. the Americas. All of this would amount to an epochal return to the world of great power competition and balance of power that prevailed before World War II. It’s less a brave new world than a reversion to a dangerous old one. Mr. Trump hasn’t articulated this, but some of the intellectuals surrounding him have. Elbridge Colby has argued that the U.S. must leave Europe and the Middle East to their own devices to focus on the Asia-Pacific. But he has also said that South Korea might have to fend for itself, and he said in a letter to us last year that “Taiwan isn’t itself of existential importance to America.”  Mr. Trump has an obligation to tell Americans what new order he thinks he is building. Then we can have a debate about his intentions and their consequences.



Saturday, March 1, 2025

Trump Is Appeasing Putin As Chamberlain Sought to Appease Hitler


By Rudy Barnes, Jr., March 1, 2025


The recent statements of Trump claiming Zelensky is a dictator with no public support who started the war in Ukraine, and Trump’s meeting with Putin to end the war without Zelensky, is similar to Neville Chamberlain's efforts to appease Hitler’s aggressions at the beginning of WWII.  Unfortunately America doesn’t have a Winston Churchill waiting in the wings to save us.

 

The abandonment of Republican support for Ukraine against Putin’s aggression reveals a feckless Republican Party that should be minimized to reduce partisan polarization and restore a functioning Congress.  Trump has so intimidated Republicans in Congress that they have succumbed to his demand for unquestioned loyalty to his reckless narcissistic policies.


Zelensky has said that Trump lives in “disinformation space.”  That’s putting it too mildly.  Trump and his spineless Republican Party have sold out Ukraine’s future--one not unlike America’s efforts to gain its freedom.   Trump is a wannabe dictator sympathetic to Putin who is  impressing the world that America doesn’t deserve the respect it had before the Trump regime.


In the wake of Trump’s unjustified criticism of Zelensky, Senator John Thune of South Dakota has said, “Right now you have to give Trump some space;”  Just the opposite is more appropriate.  Trump has made a mess of U.S. policy toward Ukraine, and there should be no more delay in correcting his grievous errors.


American voters must recruit and elect independents to fill GOP Congressional seats in 2026 to correct Trump policies.  After viable independent candidates are recruited, then ballots must be secured and counted to prevent a Russian style mockery of democracy.  Remember, Trump favors Putin’s style of democracy, and he would likely assist Trump with election fraud.


For Republicans to redeem their party they must pledge independence from Trump and loyalty to support and defend the Constitution from radical right corruptions, like Project 2025. The elections in 2026 and 2028 will allow American democracy to be born again, once again promoting the light of liberty and the common good in an otherwise dark world.


Americans can’t claim ignorance for the demise of democracy and abandoning Ukraine. They should have seen it coming with Trump’s first term and his campaign promises in 2024.  Trump has referred to Musk as an unelected “patriot” and empowered him to head DOGE to reshape the Constitution and eliminate essential government services.


So far Congress and the courts have not prevented Trump and Musk from appeasing Putin for his aggression in Ukraine.  Great Britain’s Parliament replaced Chamberlain with Winston Churchill, who led the Allies to victory over Hitler in WW II; but the U.S. Constitution doesn’t provide an option for Congress to replace Trump with a statesman like Churchill.



Notes:

On Trump Firing Joint Chiefs Chairman Amid Flurry of Dismissals at Pentagon, see https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/21/us/politics/trump-fires-cq-brown-pentagon.html.

The NYTimes Editorial Board asked, Who Will Stand Up to Trump on Ukraine? https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/22/opinion/trump-ukraine-russia-republicans.html.

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, once called Mr. Putin a “thug” and a war criminal, saying he “needs to be dealt with.” But shortly after Mr. Trump announced that Mr. Putin had extended an invitation for the president to travel to Moscow, Mr. Graham changed his tune substantially, writing on social media that Mr. Trump “is Ukraine’s best hope to end this war honorably and justly,” adding that he believes the president “will be successful and he will achieve this goal in the Trump way. ”On Republicans Being Mum after Trump Turned Toward Russia and Against Ukraine”, see  https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/us/politics/trump-ukraine-russia-republicans.html.

On the Disturbing Question at the Heart of the Trump Putin Drama, Thomas L. Friedman has opined, “I can’t blame our traditional friends for being disoriented. But Trump completely misreads Putin. He thinks Putin just needs a little positive attention, a little understanding, a little concern for his security needs — a hug! — and he will sign the peace Trump so badly desires. Nonsense.  Putin is not looking for “peace in Ukraine. He is looking for victory in Ukraine" — because without a victory, ‘he is very vulnerable at home. Capitalist democracies will do anything for peace, and Putin’s autocracy will do anything for victory. We need to switch that around. The way to do that would be by signaling to Putin that the Western allies will see his bet and raise him one — “not maligning a heroic nation” that has been fighting to preserve a Europe whole and free.”  See https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/25/opinion/trump-putin-ukraine.html.

The U.S. has reportedly struck a deal with Ukraine that includes access to rare earth minerals for U.S. aid to Ukraine.  According to one Ukrainian official, some technical details are still to be determined. However, the draft does not include a contentious Trump administration proposal to give the U.S. $500 billion worth of profits from Ukraine’s rare earth minerals as compensation for its wartime assistance to Kyiv.  The U.S. and Ukraine would have joint ownership of a fund, and Ukraine would in the future contribute 50% of future proceeds from state-owned resources, including minerals, oil, and gas. One official said the deal had better terms of investments and another one said that Kyiv secured favorable amendments and viewed the outcome as “positive.” The deal does not, however, include security guarantees. One official said that this would be something the two presidents would discuss when they meet. https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-economic-agreement-us-72ee2cfa720f6a42455c5425007060e6.


Saturday, February 22, 2025

Musings on the Demise of American Democracy: We Should Have Seen it Coming

By Rudy Barnes, Jr., February 22, 2025


          There have been several recent commentaries on the demise of American democracy. In 2020 I wrote a commentary on the Demise of American Democracy: Is It Deja Vu All Over Again?  At the beginning of Trump’s second term in 2024, Trump invited Elon Musk to lead a wrecking crew to reduce American democracy to an oligarchy that reflected Project 2025.


The free-spending Bidenomics of Joe Biden and America’s massive national debt set the stage for Trump’s radical right Republicans to take over America’s democracy.  After Trump’s victory in 2024, it should have been no surprise that Trump invited Musk as a fellow predatory capitalist to fill the political vacuum--and here we are.  We should have seen it coming.


Trump and Musk have precedents as predatory capitalists.  Musk is a 21st century version of Cecil Rhodes, a 19th century British predatory capitalist admired by Trump.  It should be no surprise that Trump is already emulating the political strategies of Victor Orban of Hungary to orchestrate the demise of American democracy and replace it with an autocracy.


Democracy is not a durable institution.  It’s only as strong as a majority of its voters make it, and it appears that a majority of American voters either support the Trump Republican regime (NBC news reported on February 15 that 53% of voters support the Trump/Musk regime), or they are indifferent to participating in politics needed to save American democracy.


Polarized partisan politics have corrupted American democracy since the 1850’s, when  Abraham Lincoln led the fledgling Republican Party to assume power after the Civil War.  That terrible war merely reversed the parties in power.  Until the 1960’s South Carolina was a one- party Democratic (blue) state; today it has become a one-party Republican (red) state.


American politics are a two-party duopoly governed by unyielding partisan institutions.  Third party candidates cannot compete with institutional partisan political structures, and candidates won’t run for office unless they have a reasonable chance of winning.  That limits candidates to the two major parties; and both parties attract demagogues like Trump and Musk.


After Trump’s first term and his campaign promises in the 2024 election, we should have seen this debacle coming.  It’s more about the degradation of political legitimacy in America than it is about Trump and Musk.  The church has failed to be a steward of the altruistic values taught by Jesus that shaped our democracy.  American democracy needs to be born again.


Without a moral reformation to restore honesty and integrity in American politics, and an affirmation of the primacy of the Constitution over Project 2025, the political devastation orchestrated by Trump and Musk will be a requiem for American democracy.  It will be lasting evidence that human depravity trumps reason and altruistic morality.   




Notes:


“President Biden and a Democratic Congress took power in 2021 with a bold plan (Bidenomics) to propel the nation out of the pandemic, revitalize American industry and bolster the working class.  It was a complete flop with the voters.”  Longtime Democratic economic advisor Jason Furman has said that “the Biden administration’s willingness to toss aside traditional economic orthodoxy around fiscal policy and run the economy hot risked higher inflation for a turbo-charged rebound from the pandemic turned out to be a bad bet.”  And it opened the door to Trump’s demagoguery.  https://www.axios.com/2025/02/11/biden-inflation-economic-policies.


Musk is America’s Cecil Rhodes, a 19th-century diamond-mining magnate in South Africa who used his fortune to help the British expand their empire.  In a phase of accelerated, furious imperialism at the end of the 19th century, Rhodes planned to build a rail and telegraph line from Cape Town to Cairo, connecting all British African colonies like beads on a string. It’s not just Trump and his fellow billionaires who do this. It is also Israel, waging all-out war against Gaza and bombing Lebanese villages without any restraint and in total disregard of international law. It is Russia invading its neighbors because President Vladimir Putin wants the old empire back, using former Wagner Group militias to get to Africa’s minerals.  It is China, too, trying to establish semi-colonial “stations” in strategic ports and get ownership of arable land, plantations, and mines on other continents. This is a zero-sum game, with the function of Musk’s empire for Trump being similar to that of Huawei or Cosco, the shipbuilding giant, for Chinese President Xi Jinping.  It also resembles the Dutch Republic in the 17th and 18th centuries in the first phase of the “capitalism of finitude” that allowed the Dutch government to build and conquer forts in many parts of the world, to negotiate and sign trade agreements, to mint coins—even to wage war.”  https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/07/elon-musk-predatory-capitalism-colonialism-cecil-rhodes/.


Bill Kristol has said: “Flipping the narrative on January 6, and becoming a pro-January 6 administration, then weaponizing the justice department talking with mass firings at the FBI is very dangerous for obvious reasons. In a real sense US democracy has died and Trump is emulating Hungary’s Orban. Borrowing from Orbán’s playbook, Trump has mobilised the culture wars, issuing a series of executive orders and policy changes that target diversity, equity and inclusion programmes and education curricula. He is also seeking to marginalise the mainstream media and supplant it with a rightwing ecosystem that includes armies of influencers and podcasters.  Jim Acosta, a former White House correspondent who often sparred with Trump, quit CNN while Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, was hired to host a new weekend show on Fox News. But the most dramatic change has been the way in which Trump has brought disruption to the federal government on an unprecedented scale, firing at least 17 inspectors general, dismantling longstanding programmes, sparking widespread public outcry and challenging the very role of Congress to create the nation’s laws and pay its bills. Government workers are being pushed to resign, entire agencies are being shuttered and federal funding to states and non-profits was temporarily frozen.  Musk orchestrated a physical takeover of the United States Agency for International Development (USAid), locking out employees and vowing to shut it down. “We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper,” Musk posted on X. The complete indifference of the Republican Congress to the ways that it is being stripped of its core constitutional functions is demoralising.  Charlie Sykes has said: “What Elon Musk represents is basically a hostile takeover of the government, and the complete indifference of the Republican Congress to the ways that it is being stripped of its core constitutional functions is demoralising. It is this mood that nothing can be done or will be done to stop them in the political community that reflects a fundamental loss of faith in the rule of law and in our system of checks and balances.”  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/07/trump-viktor-orban-electoral-autocracy.


Trump targets a growing list of those he sees as disloyal, “fulfilling his promises that he would retaliate against those who did him wrong.”   https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/17/us/politics/trump-retribution-list.html.

Zelensky says Trump lives in ‘disinformation space.’  It seems that Trump has abandoned Ukraine by failing to invite Ukraine to peace talks with Putin. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/19/europe/zelensky-trump-reaction-intl/index.html

Demagoguery is not limited to Republicans.  South Carolina’s Pitchfork Ben Tillman and Louisiana's Huey Long (aka Kingfish) are notorious Democrats who are members of America’s political hall of dishonor.  See Religion, Democracy, Diversity and Demagoguery at 

https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2016/03/religion-democracy-diversity-and.html.


On tribalism, partisan polarization and civil religion in politics, see  https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/09/tribalism-and-american-civil-religion.html.


On Lamentations of an Old White Male Maverick Methodist in a Tribal Culture, see https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/10/lamentations-of-old-white-male-maverick.html.


On A 2020 commentary predicting the Demise of American Democracy, see https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2020/09/musings-on-demise-of-american-democracy.html.


Demagoguery is not limited to Republicans.  South Carolina’s Pitchfork Ben Tillman and Louisiana's Huey Long (aka Kingfish) are notorious Democrats who are members of America’s political hall of dishonor.  See Religion, Democracy, Diversity and Demagoguery at 

https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2016/03/religion-democracy-diversity-and.html.


On tribalism, partisan polarization and civil religion in politics, see  https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/09/tribalism-and-american-civil-religion.html.


On Lamentations of an Old White Male Maverick Methodist in a Tribal Culture, see https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/10/lamentations-of-old-white-male-maverick.html.


On A 2020 commentary predicting the Demise of American Democracy, see https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2020/09/musings-on-demise-of-american-democracy.html.


On Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Need for a Politics of Reconciliation, see https://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2020/10/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on-need.html.



Saturday, February 15, 2025

Musings on How American Democracy Could Be Undermined by Project 2025

Musings on How American Democracy Could Be Undermined by Project 2025

By Rudy Barnes, Jr., February 15, 2025


The oath of office of the President of the U.S. is, “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."  By expanding the executive powers Project 2025 can violate the Constitutional separation of powers.


Article I of the Constitution grants all legislative powers to Congress, while Article II grants all executive power to the President, and Article III vests the power of judicial review to the courts.  With a Congress polarized by partisan politics, the executive branch has been left by default to make laws by executive order, subject to judicial review.


In 2026, voters will have the opportunity to end the partisan polarization of Congress.  All members of the House of Representatives and many in the Senate will be running for office.  While America will have to wait until 2028 for the next presidential election, independent voters can end partisan polarization and restore the Constitutional separation of powers in 2026. 


That is, unless before then, the courts allow Trump and Musk to continue to expand the power of the President with Project 2025 by making laws by executive order that increase the powers of the executive branch in the Constitution at the expense of the legislative branch.  Executive orders of the President should not encroach on the legislative function of Congress.


Trump and Musk promote a form of oligarchy that favors the rich and powerful over a democracy that favors people of modest means.  They favor a powerful executive branch that attracts demagogues like Trump and Musk that can reduce the powers of Congress over the executive branch and reduce the effectiveness of government by attrition and automation.


If you wonder how that would work, think about how large megacorporations have automated their services and minimized their workers, making it difficult to get personal services.  Can you imagine depending on a government that has automated all of its services?  That’s the vision of oligarchs like Trump and Musk of the federal workforce in the future.  


In the public sector the governing moral principle is to promote the common good, not selfish interests to make a profit, as favored in capitalism by the rich and powerful.  Unlike the private sector, the objective of government is to serve public needs, not to make a profit.  Too often politicians confuse those contrasting objectives.  


The objective to promote the common good is based on the altruistic moral imperative of the greatest commandment taught by Jesus to love God and our neighbors as we love ourselves.  That’s why altruistic norms of faith should be prevalent in government, while the profit motive remains dominant in the capitalist businesses of the private sector.  Meanwhile, the courts must prevent Project 2025 from undermining the separation of powers in the Constitution. 


Notes:

Project 2025 is a political initiative to reshape the federal government of the United States and remove checks on executive power in favor of right-wing policies. See Project 2025 at Wikipedia. It was published in April 2023 by the American conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation in anticipation of Donald Trump winning the 2024 presidential election.[4][5  The ninth iteration of the Heritage Foundation's Mandate for Leadership series, Project 2025 asserts a controversial interpretation of the unitary executive theory according to which the entire executive branch is under the complete control of the president.[6][7] To achieve its goals, the project calls for merit-based federal civil service workers to be replaced with people loyal to the president[8] to take partisan control of key government agencies, like the Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Commerce (DOC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Other agencies, like the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), would be dismantled, and the Department of Education (ED) abolished.[9  Once these measures are in place, the president would be free to implement the agenda, including reducing taxes on corporations and capital gains, instituting a flat income tax on individuals,[10] cutting Medicare and Medicaid,[11][12] and reversing Biden's policies.[13][14] Other goals of the project include infusing government and society with conservative Christian values[15][16] and rejecting abortion as health care.[17][18] It calls for making the National Institutes of Health (NIH) less independent, stopping it from funding stem cell research, and reducing environmental regulations to favor fossil fuels.[19] It proposes eliminating coverage of emergency contraception[11] and prosecuting people who send and receive contraceptives and abortion pills.[18][20] It proposes criminalizing pornography,[21] removing legal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity,[22][23] and terminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs[5][23] while having the DOJ prosecute anti-white racism instead.[24] The project recommends the arrest, detention, and mass deportation of illegal immigrants living in the U.S.[25][26] and deploying the military for domestic law enforcement.[27]  Proponents of the project argue it would dismantle what they view as a vast, unaccountable, and mostly liberal governmental bureaucracy.[28] Critics have characterized Project 2025 as an authoritarian, Christian nationalist plan[15][29][30] that would steer the U.S. toward autocracy.[31] Legal experts have said it would undermine the rule of law,[32] separation of powers,[5] separation of church and state,[31] and civil liberties.[5][32][33  Project 2025 is closely connected to Donald Trump, with many contributors and Heritage Foundation employees associated with him, his 2024 campaign, his first administration, and his allies.[34][35][36][37][38] Trump campaign officials had regular contact with Project 2025, seeing its goals as aligned with their Agenda 47 program.[28][39][40][41] But amid media scrutiny during the 2024 presidential campaign, Trump distanced himself from it, calling some of its proposals "ridiculous and abysmal".[37][42][43][44] Critics dismissed Trump's denials, pointing to the many people close to him directly involved, the many contributors expected to be appointed to leadership roles during Trump's second presidency, his endorsement of the Heritage Foundation's plans in 2022, and the 300 times Trump is mentioned in the plans.[45][46][47][48]

On Trump Brazingly Defies Laws in Escalating Executive Power Grab. see https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/05/us/trump-federal-law-power.html.