Saturday, October 15, 2022

Musings on Defending Democracy in Ukraine and Taiwan

By Rudy Barnes, Jr.


Putin made a mistake in timing his aggression in Ukraine.  He must face an election in 2024 with increasing signs of public opposition.  Xi Jinping will not make the same mistake if the Chinese Communist Congress affirms his continued leadership next week, as expected.  While the U.S. is committed to defend democracy in Ukraine, defending Taiwan will be another matter.


Russia and China pose an existential threat to democracy.  Putin has made it clear that even with military setbacks he will continue his efforts to destroy Ukraine’s democracy; but even if Ukraine can successfully end Russian aggression, protecting Taiwan from Chinese aggression may be beyond the capabilities (or the will) of the world’s democracies.


Materialism and hedonism in the U.S. and other western democracies have tarnished the ideal of libertarian democracy in authoritarian regimes.  The traditional appeal of freedom and democracy to the masses in Russia and China has faded in favor of nationalism and economic security; and the nuclear threats of Russia and China only exacerbate the political dilemma.


President Biden has been less than forceful in opposing Putin’s increased aggression against civilian targets and his nuclear threats in Ukraine.  Biden and the coalition of democracies assisting Ukraine must provide more air defense and long range weapons to defend against Russia’s missiles, and also be prepared to counter Putin’s nuclear threat.      


Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are both demagogues who oppose democracy, but they have their differences.  Russia is a putative democracy while China remains a Communist regime, and the nations are divided by a continuing Sino-Soviet boundary dispute; and Putin is a classic demagogue bully, while Xi’s political persona is more patient and reserved.


Xi is watching Putin’s strategy in Ukraine closely as a guide for his recovery of Taiwan.  While Xi has not been as quick as Putin to use force to accomplish his objectives, both nations are nuclear powers committed to extend their boundaries.  Defending both Ukraine and Taiwan from aggression will require the support of all the world’s democracies.  All share the danger.


Freedom isn’t free.  Ukrainians are now experiencing the bloody cost of freedom in the face of the unprovoked and unlawful aggression of Russia.  It’s making a mockery of the international laws of war and human decency.  The U.S. and other democracies must help Ukraine pay the price of freedom now, or it will soon be even more costly. 


America is accustomed to defeating authoritarianism based on the moral supremacy of its democracy and military supremacy.  That expectation is now being put to the test in Ukraine, and will likely be challenged again in Taiwan.  If the U.S. and democracies around the world aren’t committed to defend democracy in Ukraine followed by a repeat performance in Taiwan, democracy will concede its political and moral supremacy to the heavy hand of authoritarianism.    



Notes:    


Fareed Zakaria has opined on What the West is still getting wrong about the rise of Xi Jinping at  https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/06/xi-jinping-crackdown-china-economy-change/?utm.


On China returning to an imperial reign under Xi, see Behold, Emperor Xi, at  https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2022/10/xi-jinping-china-national-party-congress/671718/.


On The world according to Xi Jinping; What China’s ideologue in chief really believes. See

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/world-according-xi-jinping-china-ideologue-kevin-rudd?ut.


On XI’s looming third term in China raising threat of war over Taiwan, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/12/china-taiwan-war-xi-jinping/?utm.


On giving in to Putin’s nuclear blackmail as a geopolitical disaster, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/11/we-cant-let-putin-win-with-nuclear-bluster-blackmail/?utm.


On the Sino-Soviet border dispute, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_border_conflict



Saturday, October 8, 2022

Musings on Putin's Aggression and Annexations in Ukraine, and his Nuclear Threat

            Rudy Barnes, Jr., October 8, 2022


Until recently American support for Ukraine against Putin’s unprovoked aggression and war crimes appeared seamless.  With the annexation of parts of Ukraine, Putin’s playbook now looks more like that of Hitler; but some members of Congress are wavering on continued support for Ukraine. Voters need to hold Congress accountable to support Ukraine in the November elections.


 Many Americans admired Hitler and opposed going to war against Germany before 1941.  After the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 8, 1941, the U.S. declared war against Japan, followed by Germany and the other Axis nations declaring war on the United States; then on December 11, 1941, Congress declared a state of war with Germany.


The threat of war should be an issue in the November elections.  If defending democracy is a vital component of U.S. foreign policy, America must make it clear to Putin in the midterm elections that Russia must withdraw from Ukraine.  Political ambiguity in responding to Russian annexation and further acts of aggression will only lead the world closer to war.


If Trump had not radicalized the Republican Party, it would be conservative rather than radical right.  Since most Democrats are liberal and opposed to any prospect of war, there may be too few traditional Republican conservatives and too many Democratic liberals to support Ukraine in an existential war with Russia.  Republicans and Democrats should count their votes. 


A partisan debate on Ukraine might have a silver lining.  It could erode America’s polarized partisan politics by muddling its traditional conservative-liberal split.  President Biden is a Democrat who supports aid for Ukraine, while the Republican Political Action Committee (CPAC) includes many opponents of aid to Ukraine, and even some supporters of Putin.


Putin’s nuclear threat is to use tactical nuclear weapons or sabotage a nuclear power plant in Ukraine if any nation seeks to liberate annexed portions of Ukraine.  That further complicates speculation on who will support or oppose military aid to Ukraine.  Even so, America and NATO should never succumb to the threat of nuclear blackmail by Russia.       


Events leading up to World War II should make Americans mindful of the risks of current events in Ukraine to world war.  Like Hitler, Putin is a dangerous demagogue seeking to expand his power.  America must avoid political miscalculations like those of Neville Chamberlain that failed to stem Hitler’s aggression in 1940.  Appeasing demagogues like Putin never works.   


Putin intends to restore the ancient Russian Empire of Peter the Great, beginning with the annexation of Ukraine.  The Russian Orthodox Church has sanctified Putin’s aggression and annexation of Ukraine, making it a cultural priority of both politics and Russian Christian nationalism.  America and NATO must prevent such an abomination from ever happening.   



Notes:

On CPAC backpedaling on a pro-Russia tweet as some U.S. conservatives back Putin, see  https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/01/cpac-ukraine-russia-tweet/?utm.

On annexations that show the depth of Putin’s imperial delusion, see  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/05/putin-colonial-imperial-delusion/?utm.

On Russia conceding big losses in south as pro-Putin voices paint a grim picture of setbacks, see https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/05/europe/ukraine-conflict-russia-losses-intl/index.html.

Ex-CIA chief says Putin is ‘out of moves’ as Ukraine takes back dozens of ‘annexed’ towns. See   https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/05/ukraine-hails-good-news-from-the-front-lines-with-major-gains-in-counteroffensives-.html.

On Ukraine hammering Russian forces into retreat on east and south fronts, see   https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/04/russia-retreat-kherson-lyman-ukraine/?utm.

On Zelensky hailing advances as open recriminations intensify in Russian media, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/02/ukraine-russia-lyman-donbas/?utm.

On Russia’s annexation puts the world “two or three” steps away from nuclear war, see  https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/01/europe-putin-nuclear-threats/.

On Biden’s instincts to avoid war being sound--even if Putin goes nuclear, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/06/putin-nuclear-biden-avoid-war/?utm.

On Biden warning of a nuclear “Armageddon” similar to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/07/russia-ukraine-war-latest-updates/?utm.

On How Ukraine’s advances are cornering Putin, making the war more dangerous, see https://thehill.com/policy/international/3676711-how-ukraines-advances-are-cornering-putin-making-the-war-more-dangerous/?

On the countries holding the world’s nuclear arsenal, see https://www.statista.com/chart/8301/the-countries-holding-the-worlds-nuclear-arsenal/.

On where U.S. nuclear bombs are stored in Europe, see  https://www.statista.com/chart/18711/bases-for-us-b61-nuclear-gravity-bombs-in-europe/.


The Washington Post Editorial Board has opined that “Putin’s language is escalating precisely because his strategic position is deteriorating. Russia does not even control all of the territory it supposedly annexed and, in fact, Ukrainian forces have recently retaken Russian-held areas.” See https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/30/putin-ukraine-war-escalation-response/?utm.

Neville Chamberlain served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940. He is best known for his foreign policy of appeasement, and in particular for his signing of the Munich Agreement on 30 September 1938, ceding the German-speaking Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany led by Adolf Hitler. Following the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939, Chamberlain announced the declaration of war on Germany two days later and led the United Kingdom through the first eight months of the war until his resignation as prime minister on 10 May 1940, when he was succeeded as prime minister by his colleague Winston Churchill. Chamberlain's reputation remains controversial among historians. See Wikipedia, at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neville_Chamberlain.


Previous commentary on Putin’s aggression in Ukraine:

(2/26/22): Musings on Russia, the Ukraine and Nuclear War: Never?

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/02/musings-on-russia-ukraine-and-nuclear.html.

(3/5/22): Musings on a New World Order Based on Reconciliation, not Conflict

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/03/musings-on-new-world-order-based-on.html.

(3/12/22): Musings on Defending Democracy from the Tyranny of a Nuclear Autocracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/03/musings-on-defending-democracy-from.html.

(3/19/22): Musings on Military Legitimacy in a  Post-American Era

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/03/musings-on-military-legitimacy-in-post.html.

(4/30/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Obsolescence of Christianity in Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/04/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on.html.

(5/28/22): Musings on How Two GOP Primaries Could Reshape American Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/05/musings-on-how-two-gop-primaries-could.html?.

(6/18/22): Musings on Shifting Strategies Against Russian Aggression in Ukraine

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/06/musings-on-shifting-strategies-against.html.

(9/24/22): Musings on the Means and Motivation to Counter Russian Escalation in Ukraine

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/09/musings-on-means-and-motivation-to.html.



Saturday, October 1, 2022

Musings on Schisms in America's Churches and Partisan Politics

        By Rudy Barnes, Jr., October 1,  2022


Schisms have polarized people in the church and politics based on deeply conflicting views.  That’s because democracy has made Americans masters of their destiny, and  popularity is the measure of success in democracy; and popularity is at odds with the altruistic morality needed to shape America’s moral standards of political legitimacy.


 That’s a problem for Christianity, since the sacrificial love taught by Jesus was never popular.  The early church recognized that anomaly; and to attract the converts it needed for popularity and power it subordinated the universal teachings of Jesus to exclusivist doctrinal beliefs in Jesus Christ as the alter ego of God, and the only means of salvation.  


Jesus was a Jew who never suggested that he was divine; and he offended his religious leaders by asserting the primacy of love over law as God’s standard of righteousness over Mosaic Law.  Jesus made reconciliation a moral priority of faith, even over worship (Matthew 5:23-26); but the church continues to ignore the priority of reconciliation over exclusivist beliefs.


The teachings of Jesus are summarized in the greatest commandment to love God and our neighbors--including those of other races and religions--as we love ourselves.  It’s taken from the Hebrew Bible, was taught by Jesus, and has been accepted by Muslims as a common word of faith.  It’s a moral imperative to reconcile with those neighbors we would rather ignore. 


Subordinating the moral teachings of Jesus to exclusivist beliefs in Jesus as a Trinitarian form of God made Christianity the world’s most popular religion; but as a form of cheap grace it now fosters the decline of Christianity.  Many Christians reject exclusivist church doctrines and have left the church; but most continue to believe that the teachings of Jesus are God’s Truth.    


Thomas Jefferson considered “the teachings of Jesus the most sublime moral code ever designed by man;” but Jefferson had contempt for exclusivist church doctrines.  Today most white Christians support Donald Trump.  His narcissistic values are the antithesis of those taught by Jesus, but few white churches challenge the corrupt morality of Trump’s Republicans.   


In America’s materialistic and hedonistic culture, most Christians worship Jesus Christ but don’t follow his teachings.  God’s will is that we reconcile our schisms, while Satan’s will is to divide and conquer.  Demagogues like Trump promote religious and political schisms that divide and conquer to gain worldly power.  Thankfully, God’s spiritual realm is not a democracy.


Church schisms have been the norm since the Reformation; and a new schism divided the church in 2016 when most white Christians voted for Trump.  Reconciliation requires that the church give primacy to the altruistic teachings of Jesus over exclusivist doctrinal beliefs.  That would likely cost the church its popularity, but it would make the reconciliation of political and religious schisms a universal priority of faith. 



Notes:


Thomas Jefferson assembled The Jefferson Bible as his personal collection of the moral teachings of Jesus, leaving out many of the mystical matters in the gospel accounts.  Jefferson understood that political legitimacy depended upon moral standards, not mystical beliefs, and that the moral standards of political legitimacy in America were derived from the Christian religion.  Jefferson held the teachings of Jesus in high regard but detested church doctrines.  In 1804 he wrote: “I consider the doctrines of Jesus as delivered by himself to contain the outlines of the sublimest morality that has ever been taught; but I hold in utmost profound detestation and execration, the corruptions of it which have been invested by priestcraft and kingcraft, constituting a conspiracy of church and state against the civil and religious liberties of man.”  Robin Meyers has echoed Jefferson’s criticism of the church in Saving Jesus from the Church: How to Stop Worshiping Christ and Start Following Jesus,  Even so, the church has continued to promote exclusivist Christian beliefs that emphasize worshiping Jesus as God rather than following him as God’s word. See Jefferson’s Jesus and Moral Standards in Religion and Politics (3/17/18) at   http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/03/jeffersons-jesus-and-moral-standards-in.html.


In American Schism (Greenleaf Book Group Press, 2021) Seth David Radwell has traced the birth of America’s polarized partisan politics to a moderate Enlightenment led by Alexander Hamilton and a radical Enlightenment led by Thomas Jefferson (see pp.101-110).  Radwell’s focus is on historical political developments rather than the evolution of the moral standards of political legitimacy.  He emphasizes “the separation between church and state” even though the First Amendment only prohibits “Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  Radwell cites the Second Great Awakening as a populist instrument devoid of the altruistic teachings of Jesus used by both Hamilton’s Federalists and Jefferson’s Republicans to promote their conflicting partisan ideals.  It was the precursor of the Moral Majority of Jerry Falwell and the white Christian nationalism that elected Donald Trump. As for moral standards in a democracy, the epistle of James asserts that a faith without deeds (or works) is as “dead as a body without the spirit” (James 2:18-26).  


Trump’s “morality” is based on self-centered moral standards similar to those of Ayn Rand’s objectivist philosophy.  It’s reminiscent of Old Testament justice based on God rewarding the obedient and punishing the disobedient in this world based on Mosaic Law.  “Life is a battleground between good and evil. This extreme dualism [can] lead to the adoption of apocalyptic religious beliefs. As the books of Daniel and Revelation reveal, the evil world will soon come to a violent end with the righteous few saved by Jesus who will take them to safety in heaven. God is portrayed as a global terrorist who brutally annihilates all the evil people who oppose him.”  And Trump’s supporters see him as their god.   https://progressivechristianity.org/resources/on-defeating-trumpism-the-answer-lies-in-the-new-testament/


Michael Gerson has explained that while Trump should fill Christians with rage, he doesn’t.  “Christian America has assumed the symbols and identity of white authoritarian populism that’s a serious, unfolding threat to liberal democracy.  Strangely, evangelicals have broadly chosen the company of Trump supporters who deny any role for character in politics and define any useful villainy as virtue.  The discordant prejudices and delusions of religious conservatives helped swell the populist wave that lapped on the steps of the Capitol on January 6, 2021.  During that assault, Christian banners mixed with the iconography of white supremacy in a manner that should have choked Christian participants with rage.  But it didn’t.  Gerson asks, “Have pastors domesticated the Christian message into something familiar, unchallenging and easily ignored?  Christians should not join interest groups that fight for their narrow rights. Rather, they should seek to be ambassadors of a kingdom of hope, mercy, justice and grace. See https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/01/michael-gerson-evangelical-christian-maga-democracy/?utm.


The United Methodist Church, like other Protestant denominations, has been caught up in a schism over the politics of sexual preference.  Bishop William Willimon has described it as “a divorce that’s a mistake.”  He said that “Caucusing is easy; church is hard. We thereby say to the world that Jesus Christ can’t make and sustain community out of people whom I don’t like and are not my type. Rather than ask, “What’s Christ up to in our neighborhood?” we say, “I refuse to be part of a church that doesn’t reflect my values before I came to church.” In May the conservative (they prefer “orthodox”) breakaway Global Methodist Church had an inauspicious birth. It’s a church created by a couple of right wing (oops, “traditional”) caucus groups. They don’t accept the label schismatic (what schismatic ever has?) and prefer instead to say that they have been pushed out of the church they once loved. In his stemwinder sermon “On Schism,” John Wesley begged those thinking about church divorce to stay and fight. Schism is always counter to the togetherness produced by Christ: “Separation is evil in itself, being a breach of brotherly love, so it brings forth evil fruit . . . the most mischievous consequences. It opens a door to all unkind tempers, both in ourselves and others.  Old Daddy Wesley, we’ve messed up again.”  See https://www.christiancentury.org/article/features/united-methodist-divorce-mistake?utm.     


Earlier commentary related to the church and schisms over morality in religion and politics: 

4/19/15): Jesus: A Prophet, God’s Only Son, or the Logoshttp://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2015/04/jesus-prophet-god-only-son-or-logos.html

(10/4/15): Faith and Religion: The Same but Different

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2015/10/faith-and-religion-same-but-different.html

(8/5/16): How Religion Can Bridge Our Political and Cultural Divide http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2016/08/how-religion-can-bridge-our-political.html

(9/17/16): A Moral Revival to Restore Legitimacy to Our Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2016/09/a-moral-revival-to-restore-legitimacy.html

(1/7/17): Religion and Reason as Sources of Political Legitimacy, and Why They Matter

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/01/religion-and-reason-as-sources-of.html

(1/28/17): Saving America from the Church

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/01/saving-america-from-church.html

(4/22/17): The Relevance of Jesus and the Irrelevance of the Church in Today’s World

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/04/the-relevance-of-jesus-and-irrelevance.html

(8/12/17): The Universalist Teachings of Jesus as a Remedy for Religious Exclusivism  

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/08/the-universalist-teachings-of-jesus-as.html.

(10/7/17): A 21st Century Reformation to Restore Reason to American Civil Religion http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/10/a-21st-century-reformation-to-restore.html.

(12/23/17): If Democracy Survives the Trump Era, Can the Church Survive Democracy? http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/12/if-democracy-survives-trump-era-can.html.

(3/17/18): Jefferson’s Jesus and Moral Standards in Religion and Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/03/jeffersons-jesus-and-moral-standards-in.html

(3/23/18) Religion and Reason as Sources of Political Legitimacy, and Why They Matter

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2017/01/religion-and-reason-as-sources-of.

(3/31/18): Altruism: The Missing Ingredient in American Christianity and Democracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/03/altruism-missinghttp://www.religionlegitimacyand

(4/7/18): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Need for a Moral Reformation

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/04/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on-need.html.

(7/14/18): Musings on Why Christians Should Put Moral Standards Over Mystical Beliefs

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/07/musings-on-why-christians-should-put.html.

(9/29/18): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Resurrection of Christian Universalism

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/09/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on.html.

(12/15/18): Musings on the Great Commission and Religious and Political Tribalism

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/12/musings-on-great-commission-and.html.

(12/22/18): Musings on Faith and Works: The Unity of All Believers and The Last Judgment

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2018/12/musings-on-faith-and-works-unity-of-all.html.

(2/9/19): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Hypocrisy of American Christianity

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/02/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on_9.html.

(3/2/19): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on a Post-Christian America

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/03/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on-post.html.

(3/16/19): Musings on the Evolution of Christian Exclusivism to Universalism

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/03/musings-on-evolution-of-christian.html.

(5/11/19): Musings on the Relevance of Jefferson’s Jesus in the 21st Century

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/05/musings-on-relevance-of-jeffersons.html.

(6/22/19): The Universal Family of God: Where Inclusivity Trumps Exclusivity

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/06/the-universal-family-of-god-where.html

(8/10/19): Musings on Christian Nationalism: A Plague on the Church and Democracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/08/musings-on-christian-nationalism-plague.html.

(9/7/19): Musings on the Self-Destruction of Christianity and American Democracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/09/musings-on-self-destruction-of.html.

(10/5/19): Musings on the Moral Relevance of Jesus to Democracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/10/musings-on-moral-relevance-of-jesus-to.html.

(11/16/19): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Irrelevance of Morality in Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/11/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on_16.html.

(11/23/19): Musings on Jesus and Christ as Conflicting Concepts in Christianity

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2019/11/musings-on-jesus-and-christ-as.html.

(6/13/20): Was Jesus the Prophet of the Gospels or the Christ of the Church?

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2020/06/was-jesus-prophet-of-gospels-or-christ.html.

(11/21/20): Democracy Has Survived Donald Trump, but Can the Church Survive Democracy?

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2020/11/democracy-has-survived-donald-trump-but.html.

(4/24/21): How a Fading Church Could Help Reconcile America’s Polarized Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2021/04/how-failing-church-could-help-reconcile.html.

(5/15/21): Musings on the Moral Failure of American Christianity and Democracy

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2021/05/musings-on-moral-failure-of-american.html.

(5/22/21): Musings on Morality and Politics and the Need for a Civil Religion in America

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2021/05/musings-on-morality-and-politics-and.html.

(7/17/21): Christianity and Politics: Separated by Irreconcilable Differences

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2021/07/christianity-and-politics-separated-by.html.

(8/14/21): Musings on Conflicting Concepts of God’s Truth in Christianity

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2021/08/musings-on-conflicting-concepts-of-gods.html.

(1/15/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on America’s Morally Muddled Mainstream

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/01/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on_15.html.

(1/22/22): Musings on Popularity as a Corrupting Influence in Democracy and Christianity

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/01/musings-on-popularity-as-corrupting.html.

(4/23/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on Why Americans Are Losing Their Religion

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/04/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on-why.html.

(4/30/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Obsolescence of Christianity in Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/04/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on.html.

(6/25/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on the Church and the Greatest Commandment

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/06/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on-church.html.

(7/23/22): Musings on Moderating Extremism in American Religion, Legitimacy and Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/07/musings-on-moderating-extremism-in.html.

(8/6/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on Moderating Hatred in Partisan Politics

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/08/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on.html.

(8/13/22): Musings of a Maverick Methodist on Religion and the Wisdom of God

http://www.religionlegitimacyandpolitics.com/2022/08/musings-of-maverick-methodist-on.html.